First, note that both ζ(z) and ζk(z) = ζ(z+k) are holomorphic everywhere in ℂ, except at their respective singularities, 1 and 1-k. Note also that the set S = ℂ\{1, 1-k} is open (since its complement, the set {1, 1-k},
Assume the antecedent holds for some open set U. It then also holds for the open set U' = U ∩ S. Select any point z in this set, and any open ball V containing z, but lying within U'. (One such must exist; if it did not, z would be on the boundary of U', and since U' is open it excludes its boundary.) The preconditions for the identity theorem are thereby met: ζ = ζk on a neighborhood of a point, z, which lies within a connected open set on which both ζ and ζk are holomorphic — namely, S.
Thus, ζ = ζk on S.
Now, assume for the sake of contradiction that k ≠ 0. Then ζ(1-k) is some complex number, since ζ is defined everywhere except at 1. Consider some sequence zn which approaches 1-k in the limit, but contains neither 1-k nor 1. (Such sequences must exist: consider the disjoint sequences (1-k)+2-n and (1-k)-2-n, only one of which might contain 1.). ζ is complex-differentiable and therefore Heine-continuous, so the sequence ζ(zn) approaches ζ(1-k). Moreover, since ζk's singularity at 1-k is a pole, ζk(zn) must approach infinity. However, this sequence is contained in S, and so ζ(zn) = ζk(zn) for all n. Since the sequences are identical, so too must be their limits; but this means that ζ(1-k) = ∞, which is a contradiction.
Therefore, k = 0.
Edit 2008-12-21: fixed a silly topology error — an empty interior does not imply closedness. (Specific counterexample: the set of all Gaussian rationals has an empty interior, but is not a closed set.)
No comments:
Post a Comment